A Bonita research guide

How to check where surgery photos and videos appeared

A post may show real footage while making a misleading claim about who performed the work. Source tracing helps you investigate that claim. It cannot establish consent, copyright ownership or the identity of the operating clinician by itself.

By Bonita Index editorial research · Updated
AI-assisted source research. No independent clinical review is claimed. How we work · Suggest a correction

1. Save the claim privately

Keep the post URL, account name, caption and the date you saw it in your own notes. A repost, an educational example and a claim to have performed surgery are different claims. Do not share patient identities or private medical details.

2. Choose a clear image

Use an image you have permission to share. For a video, open a local clip in Bonita, pause on a distinctive moment and choose Use this moment. Download the prepared frame. Try more than one moment; a cover image does not represent the whole video.

3. Search with Google Lens

Open Google Images, choose Search by image, then Upload a file and select your saved image. On a phone, open Google Lens in the Google app and select the saved image. Inspect results that lead to pages containing the image; a similar-looking face alone is not a match. This search happens on Google, under its own terms.

4. Try a second search with TinEye

Open TinEye and upload the same saved image, or paste a direct image URL. Inspect the matching pages. Its Oldest order means earliest found by TinEye, not necessarily first published or created. Different services can return different leads.

5. Compare the evidence

Open the pages themselves. Compare the image, account, caption, credits and any visible publication dates. Keep each date beside the page that supports it. A matching image is a lead, not proof of who performed the procedure. Private, edited, deleted or newly posted material may be missing from search results.

6. Ask before concluding

Ask the practice where it first published the work and how it can substantiate the claim being made. Reuse may be authorized. The oldest result you find can itself be a repost, and no matches do not prove originality. If the evidence is inconclusive, leave the question open.

Sources to open

This is research education, not individualized medical advice.

Help choose what comes next

Would you use image matching inside Bonita?

Instead of opening Google Lens or TinEye yourself, you could submit a selected image and review matching-page leads here. This is a possible future feature, not available today. Matches would still need your judgment.

How useful would this be to you?

Submitting sends your choice and whether you voted from the guide or tool. A random response ID helps prevent duplicate submissions. No email, image or searched link is included. About vote storage

Your vote helps us decide whether to test a small pilot. No launch date is set.